Community policing conveys an array of expectations relating to the law obligation departments of our society. These startling responses for real depend upon how we as individuals and groups view the roles set aside for the police within the confines of our system. If we exist within a center city atmosphere than our beliefs and observations are understandable different then those people who reside in a rural environment. It only stands to calculate that when the officer's comprehension of their role and the citizen's perception of that role are in conflict that problem often arise.
Not everybody perceives the officer's role equally however these roles can be broken down into any diverse divisions. On the one hand we have those citizens who view the law obligation personnel as community leaders devoted to group safety. They are afforded as a group the selection of a broad discretion in the manner in which they guide themselves and accomplish their job. Then you have some people who view the peace officers as a psychological crutch to contribute resolutions on a short term basis. Lastly, you have a amount of people who know the risks related with the profession and appreciate their assistance within hostile environments.
Cooper Hand Tools
Throughout the discussion we must continually keep in mind the aspects for which police work entails, such as rapid ability to make split instant decisions, the ability to work as an independent entity, and accomplishing the dangerous work which they do for the benefit of community as a whole.
Once the officer has completed his training and has been released in the field he often develops his own brand of operational style. While his study of eight different police departments there were three exact styles identified by James Q. Wilson in 1968. They were the Legalistic, Watchman and the assistance style. The varied typology related with these three styles are just as beneficial today as it was when the styles were initially defined. I will endeavor to correlate the three styles in order to qualify one as more important then another.
Let's briefly identify the first style offered by Wilson as the Legalistic style. This is the most typical of all for it concentrates upon the acts related with violations of the law. Its principle tools lie in the use of threats and the extreme act of arrest in order to decree disputes in the middle of individuals. The legalistic style officer is commitment to following the letter of the law and often views his arrests as a focus upon community safety. This style is recurrently found within large metropolitan areas.
The watchman style relies upon the informal methods to decree disputes and is frequently found within the poorer communities. This style is dominated by informal police interventions which use methods such as persuasion or threats rather than the usual arrest. These areas are powder kegs ready to blow up so the officers must use caution since their amount one priority is to maintaining group order.
Lastly, we have the assistance where the emphasis is normally settled upon the community as opposed to law enforcement. The assistance style is intended upon helping the community in a close hand in hand endeavor complimented by working closely with the local group assistance agencies. These officers usual prefer to use a referral rather than to arrest the offenders or inaugurate formal court actions. The assistance style is prominently found in the more wealthy communities.
We can not say with any certainty that each officer selects one or the other of these styles since each would react differently according to the situation but rather they tend to form a delicate equilibrium composed of a limited of each. I personally feel that there is no exact style that is better then the others. The legalistic coming would best serve the community in general. Rules are rules and the law should be obeyed. If minor infringements are continually overlooked then we may as well not have the law on the books at all. However, we must tamper our zealousness with compassion and endeavor to place those individuals who desire help to the permissible authorities for disposition therefore a measure of assistance must be included as well.
In view of the terrorist threat which continually menaces our community since the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9-11, it is felt that sure concessions have taken place within these styles. The issue of terrorism is a fairly new branch in the field of criminal justice and has been initiated in a methodical manner into our police directive. With a disaster of that proportion it is sure that changes would necessarily take place. I feel the largest convert has occurred within the confines of the Legalistic style officers. They have advanced a more intense recipe of completing their patrols then they previously had employed. They now are aware that foreign as well as homegrown enemies are actively performing their trade within America's boarders. By the use of systematic terrorist violence these people endeavor to attain their political objective at the cost of innocent people while their actions are frequently intended to work on a exact audience. The patrols have gained a new comprehension and are now particularly vigil for suspicious individuals or asset that could be the handiwork of terrorist agents. They write back in a quicker but safer manner to alarm activations or reports of unusual activities.
Their coordination with their homeland security counterparts has increased greatly. They now freely exchange data as they work closely within a joint endeavor of law enforcement. Aggressive patrol has been increasing within the field while some citizens still complain that the process is an inconvenience to them when random traffic stops are conducted. They often forget how the actions finished could maybe save their lives.
Although Wilson may have initially established the ramp for law obligation styles he was speedily joined by people such as John Broderick with his four versions of the police community with William Muir and his input to the topic close behind. There is never a shortage of categories to place our law enforcer's into. I suppose the extreme definition would be how the officers themselves would define their style of policing.
Copyright @2010 Joseph Parish
http://www.survival-training.info
